| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Subject: | Re: tsearch2api project |
| Date: | 2007-10-18 00:29:08 |
| Message-ID: | 13528.1192667348@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> but I would
> #define ENVELOPE_FCE(name,dest) \
> Datum name (PG_FUNCTION_ARGS); \
> PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(name); \
> Datum \
> name (PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) \
> { \
> return (dest)(fceinfo); \
> }
That seems perfectly legitimate to me --- I'm pretty sure there are
several instances of that in the core code already.
I'd be more inclined to call the macro WRAPPER_FUNCTION, perhaps.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2007-10-18 00:43:32 | Re: Hash index todo list item |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-17 23:22:04 | Re: About to remove current contents of contrib/tsearch2 |