Re: Coding in WalSndWaitForWal

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Coding in WalSndWaitForWal
Date: 2020-01-09 20:58:26
Message-ID: 13495.1578603506@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> However, we already have a large number of proc_exit() calls in switch
> blocks that are not followed by breaks. In fact, the majority are
> already like that.

Oh, hmm ... consistency is good.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-01-09 21:31:44 Re: 12.1 not useable: clientlib fails after a dozen queries (GSSAPI ?)
Previous Message David Kimura 2020-01-09 20:55:03 Re: Make autovacuum sort tables in descending order of xid_age