From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade tests vs alter generic changes |
Date: | 2012-09-29 19:15:20 |
Message-ID: | 1348945575-sup-1522@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of sáb sep 29 14:57:11 -0300 2012:
>
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > Well, that's a very good point. chough is actually the same machine,
> > doing an MSVC build. So why would this test pass there? I'll investigate
> > a bit more. Here's what the regression diffs look like when run from
> > pg_upgrade on pitta:
>
> > ALTER COLLATION alt_coll1 RENAME TO alt_coll3; -- OK
> > ! ERROR: collation "alt_coll1" for encoding "SQL_ASCII" does not exist
>
> vs
>
> > ALTER COLLATION alt_coll1 RENAME TO alt_coll3; -- OK
> > ! ERROR: collation "alt_coll1" for encoding "WIN1252" does not exist
>
> Oh! So Alvaro's second expected file is assuming that machines without
> custom-locale support will only ever be testing with SQL_ASCII encoding.
> Wrong.
>
> At this point I'm inclined to think that we should just drop the
> collation-specific portions of the alter_generic test. It looks to me
> like making that adequately portable is going to be far more trouble
> than it's worth.
Ah, yes. We already dropped some plperl tests because of a similar
problem. I will remove that part of the test.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2012-09-29 21:01:58 | Re: is JSON really "a type" (Re: data to json enhancements) |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2012-09-29 19:13:22 | doc patch for increase in shared_buffers |