Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests
Date: 2026-02-03 22:52:15
Message-ID: 1347743.1770159135@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> writes:
> Hello, was this forgotten, or is there some other reason why the
> commitfest entry is still open?
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/4959/

It's certainly still a live issue -- I ran into it just a couple weeks
ago with what became a1d7ae2b2 [1]. I had forgotten that there were
proposed patches addressing it.

regards, tom lane

[1] https://postgr.es/m/flat/db6fdb35a8665ad3c18be01181d44b31(at)postgrespro(dot)ru

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2026-02-03 23:16:17 Re: pg_upgrade: transfer pg_largeobject_metadata's files when possible
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2026-02-03 22:42:53 Re: refactor architecture-specific popcount code