On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 16:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> and obviously, python is iterating through the hash's keys in a
> different order than it was a minor version or two back. (The failure
> is occurring with 3.3.0-0.4.rc1.fc19, whereas I saw no failure with
> 3.2.3-7.fc17.)
Yes, known problem with 3.3.
>
> I think probably the best thing is to change the test case so it has
> one
> valid key and one not-valid one, rather than assuming that the same
> key
> will always be complained of when there's more than one not-valid
> one.
That would probably work. We dealt with a similar problem in
2cfb1c6f77734db81b6e74bcae630f93b94f69be, if you want some additional
inspiration. Not sure why we didn't see this case then.