Re: Small patch for pg_basebackup argument parsing

From: Pierre Ducroquet <p(dot)psql(at)pinaraf(dot)info>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Small patch for pg_basebackup argument parsing
Date: 2017-04-22 16:46:26
Message-ID: 13468936.jO5Y3CKu5e@peanuts2
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Saturday, April 22, 2017 11:31:58 PM CEST Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Pierre Ducroquet <p(dot)psql(at)pinaraf(dot)info>
wrote:
> > Following your advice, I went through the source tree and cleaned up most
> > instances of that pattern.
> > I have attached the corresponding patch to this mail.
> > If you think this patch is indeed interesting, what would be the next way
> > to have it reviewed ?
>
> Here are the general guidelines about patch submission:
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch
> And the best thing would be to register it to the next commit fest so
> as it does not get lost:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/

Thank you, I added an entry in the next commit fest.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-04-22 17:51:30 A note about debugging TAP failures
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-04-22 16:37:50 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders