Re: splitting htup.h

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: splitting htup.h
Date: 2012-08-29 15:54:03
Message-ID: 1346255607-sup-9799@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of mié ago 29 11:32:04 -0400 2012:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar ago 28 17:27:51 -0400 2012:

> > This should
> > reduce the number of changes needed, not only in our code but third
> > party code. Not sure if the new file could sanely be called
> > "htup_private.h"; it seems a bit widely used for that. Maybe "heap.h"?
>
> Not sure I really like heap.h, but let's put that aside for a moment.

... we already have catalog/heap.h, so that would be one reason to avoid
that name.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-08-29 16:06:25 Re: splitting htup.h
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-08-29 15:47:14 Re: splitting htup.h