| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Minor addition to index documentation |
| Date: | 2015-12-06 17:45:14 |
| Message-ID: | 13449.1449423914@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Maybe "GiST indexes require nine support functions, two of which are
> optional, as shown in XYZ".
That wording seems just as bizarre to me: a support function can hardly
be both "required" and "optional". After a bit of thought I changed it
to
GiST indexes have nine support functions, two of which are optional,
I noted that the corresponding wording for GIN indexes was a bit out
of date too :-(. Pushed with those corrections.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2015-12-07 13:33:43 | Re: [HACKERS] max_worker_processes on the standby |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-12-04 15:56:16 | Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby |