Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dim(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes
Date: 2007-02-19 16:20:11
Message-ID: 13427.1171902011@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dimitri Fontaine <dim(at)dalibo(dot)com> writes:
> You're both saying RAID/LVM implementations provide good enough performances
> for PG not having to go this way, if I understand correctly.

There's certainly no evidence to suggest that reimplementing them
ourselves would be a productive use of our time.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Smet 2007-02-19 16:21:52 Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-02-19 16:18:36 Re: pg_proc without oid?