Re: pgsql_fdw in contrib

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Shigeru HANADA <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw in contrib
Date: 2012-07-13 19:46:01
Message-ID: 1342208761.23760.6.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tor, 2012-07-12 at 19:44 +0900, Shigeru HANADA wrote:
> Yes, I've proposed to rename existing postgresql_fdw_validator to
> dblink_fdw_validator and move it into contrib/dblink so that pgsql_fdw
> can use the name "postgresql_fdw" and "postgresql_fdw_validator".

I was somehow under the impression that plproxy also used this, but I
see now that it doesn't. So I agree with renaming the existing
postgresql_fdw and moving it into the dblink module.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-07-13 19:47:56 Re: Support for XLogRecPtr in expand_fmt_string?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-07-13 19:41:27 Re: Schema version management