Re: Re: Allow replacement of bloated primary key indexes without foreign key rebuilds

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Allow replacement of bloated primary key indexes without foreign key rebuilds
Date: 2012-07-10 15:40:08
Message-ID: 1341934770-sup-6570@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar jul 10 10:44:03 -0400 2012:

> All of these things seem like ugly, hard-to-use kluges anyway (the
> make-sure-the-indexes-match business is just as much of a PITA for the
> DBA as it is for the system). What we really want is REINDEX
> CONCURRENTLY.

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.47.9961 ?

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Farina 2012-07-10 15:46:46 Re: Synchronous Standalone Master Redoux
Previous Message Shaun Thomas 2012-07-10 15:36:11 Re: Synchronous Standalone Master Redoux