| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Vik Reykja <vikreykja(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Schema version management |
| Date: | 2012-07-08 19:31:32 |
| Message-ID: | 1341775892.2058.9.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On lör, 2012-07-07 at 17:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Sure. You need not look further than "/" to find an operator name that
> absolutely *will* cause trouble if it's dumped into a filename
> literally.
But that problem applies to all object names.
> If we think that operators outside of extensions will be an infrequent
> special case, what about just dumping all of them into a single file
> named "operators"? And similarly for casts?
If we think they are an infrequent case, why make a fuss about it? Just
treat them like any other object.
In practical terms, I dislike the particular solution proposed here.
For one thing, it would undermine the original purpose of this whole
thread, namely insulating dump output files from ordering differences.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-07-08 22:39:30 | Re: regex_fixed_prefix() is still a few bricks shy of a load |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-07-08 19:27:30 | Re: Schema version management |