From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1 |
Date: | 2012-06-19 00:12:23 |
Message-ID: | 1340064559-sup-8577@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of vie jun 15 16:27:50 -0400 2012:
> The attached patch contains all the infrastructure for event triggers
> and also a first implementation of them for the event "command_start",
> implemented in a single place in utility.c.
>
> The infrastructure is about:
>
> - new catalog
> - grammar for new commands
> - documentation skeleton
> - pg_dump support
> - psql support
> - ability to actually run user triggers
> - written in "core languages"
> (pl/c, pl/pgsql, pl/python, pl/perl, pl/tcl)
> - limited subcommand handling
Did you try REASSIGN OWNED and DROP OWNED with a role that has defined
some event triggers?
> Look, it's an easy little skinny patch to review, right:
>
> git --no-pager diff --shortstat master
> 62 files changed, 4546 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
Skinny ... right. I started to give it a look -- I may have something
useful to comment later.
> This patch includes regression tests that we worked on with Thom last
> rounds, remember that they only run in the serial schedule, that means
> with `make installcheck` only. Adding noisy output at random while the
> parallel schedule run is a good way to break all the regression testing,
> so I've been avoiding that.
Hmm, I don't like the idea of a test that only runs in serial mode.
Maybe we can find some way to make it work in parallel mode as well.
I don't have anything useful to comment right now.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Misa Simic | 2012-06-19 00:19:28 | Re: [PATCH] Support for foreign keys with arrays |
Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2012-06-18 22:47:54 | Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node |