Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Should we keep using trac?

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: "Dickson S(dot) Guedes" <listas(at)guedesoft(dot)net>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we keep using trac?
Date: 2012-06-18 08:30:25
Message-ID: 1340008225.3923.22.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 12:15 -0300, Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
> 2012/6/17 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>:
> > Quick question: is trac the right tool?
> Which problems we are trying to solve using trac? Are they solved or minimized?

Good questions. I use it so that I don't forget a bug to fix, and a
feature request to work on.

> > Maybe trac is not the right tool, and we should use something else?
> Maybe are we using it the right way?
> I like trac and redmine, the former to projects that are simple, with
> simple workflow, the second to more complex projects, with
> sub-project, ticket dependencies and, IMHO, a better notion of
> "progress" for tickets and milestones.
> Which goals we want to achieve?

For me, tracking bugs, and feature requests.


In response to


pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2012-06-18 08:32:26
Subject: pgAdmin website commit: Update the website's polish translation
Previous:From: Ashesh VashiDate: 2012-06-18 06:46:25
Subject: Re: PoC: Little improvements to EditGrid - Enum ComboBox

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group