| From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dickson S(dot) Guedes" <listas(at)guedesoft(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we keep using trac? |
| Date: | 2012-06-18 08:30:25 |
| Message-ID: | 1340008225.3923.22.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 12:15 -0300, Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
> 2012/6/17 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>:
> > Quick question: is trac the right tool?
>
> Which problems we are trying to solve using trac? Are they solved or minimized?
>
Good questions. I use it so that I don't forget a bug to fix, and a
feature request to work on.
> > Maybe trac is not the right tool, and we should use something else?
>
> Maybe are we using it the right way?
>
> I like trac and redmine, the former to projects that are simple, with
> simple workflow, the second to more complex projects, with
> sub-project, ticket dependencies and, IMHO, a better notion of
> "progress" for tickets and milestones.
>
> Which goals we want to achieve?
>
For me, tracking bugs, and feature requests.
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2012-06-18 08:32:26 | pgAdmin website commit: Update the website's polish translation |
| Previous Message | Ashesh Vashi | 2012-06-18 06:46:25 | Re: PoC: Little improvements to EditGrid - Enum ComboBox |