| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade libraries check |
| Date: | 2012-05-29 22:49:39 |
| Message-ID: | 1338331779.28651.9.camel@sussancws0025 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 16:06 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > I don't recall exactly what problems drove us to make pg_upgrade do
> > what it does with extensions, but we need a different fix for them.
>
> Well, you need pg_upgrade to preserve the OIDs of objects that are
> part of extensions just as you do for any other objects.
Also, I think it needs to force the extension version to match the old
cluster. Otherwise, we could be dealing with on-disk format changes, or
other complexities.
It doesn't sound difficult, but I thought I'd bring it up.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2012-05-29 22:54:59 | Re: Performance patch for Win32 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-05-29 22:42:45 | Re: Performance patch for Win32 |