Re: pg_basebackup's --gzip switch misbehaves

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup's --gzip switch misbehaves
Date: 2022-09-22 04:47:34
Message-ID: 1338170.1663822054@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 11:43:56PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't have any opinion on the concrete merits of this change,
>> but I want to note that 15rc1 wraps on Monday, and we don't like
>> people pushing noncritical changes shortly before a wrap. There
>> is not a lot of time for fooling around here.

> If I were to do it in the next couple of hours, we'd still have quite
> a couple of days of coverage, which is plenty as far as I understand?

Sure. I'd say we have 48 hours to choose whether to put this in v15.
But not more than that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Chudnovsky 2022-09-22 04:55:08 Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Previous Message John Naylor 2022-09-22 04:46:24 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum