Re: Hacking on PostgreSQL via GIT

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>
Cc: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hacking on PostgreSQL via GIT
Date: 2007-04-17 01:58:57
Message-ID: 13369.1176775137@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> writes:
> Now, on my hand-crafted GIT repo - you see them in and out now with
> Tom's commits. But any *real* conversion tracking the *actual* RCS cvs
> states should have them checked out from 1999 to now in the state they
> were from vadim's last changes, and Tom's first commit will "truncate"
> them (because he checked them in as empty files), and the 2nd commit
> will remove them again.

> So it's still a "gotcha" if you're trying to get a copy of CVS from ages
> ago via one of the alternative SCM conversions...

It shouldn't be a big problem, assuming the checkout preserves the file
dates --- they'll look older than the source files and so a rebuild will
happen anyway in such a checkout.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2007-04-17 01:59:40 Grantor name gets lost when grantor role dropped
Previous Message Aidan Van Dyk 2007-04-17 01:49:08 Re: Hacking on PostgreSQL via GIT