Re: Executing inet_server_addr/port() in parallel workers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Executing inet_server_addr/port() in parallel workers
Date: 2021-01-13 21:24:23
Message-ID: 1336801.1610573063@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Having said that, I'm fine with the idea of just marking these
> parallel-restricted in HEAD and ignoring the problem in the back
> branches.

Hearing no complaints, done that way.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-01-13 21:29:31 Re: [DOC] Document concurrent index builds waiting on each other
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2021-01-13 21:17:24 Re: automatic analyze: readahead - add "IO read time" log message