Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Katsuhiko Okano <okano(dot)katsuhiko(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2
Date: 2006-09-03 16:15:27
Message-ID: 13361.1157300127@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> OTOH I think we only need to store live Xids and those finished that
> wrote a WAL record; we can drop subaborted and subcommitted if they
> didn't.

While reviewing this thread, I see Alvaro already had the idea I just
came to...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-09-03 16:27:48 Re: Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-03 16:08:58 Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-03 19:25:06 Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-03 16:08:58 Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2