| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. |
| Date: | 2012-09-03 16:11:45 |
| Message-ID: | 1336.1346688705@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
>>
>> This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something*
>> here.
> We have cascading replication as a major feature, which I agree it is.
> But I think we should add the (closely related) base backups from
> slave to the list as well - I've had more people say they're really
> going to use that one than the cascading replication. Perhaps add them
> both on the same bullet point?
Sure, reword it however you want. I've not been paying much attention
to replication stuff, so I don't really know what's important there.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-09-03 16:57:52 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-09-03 16:06:29 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-09-03 16:16:04 | Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-09-03 16:06:29 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. |