From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: libpq URI and regression testing |
Date: | 2012-04-17 18:41:04 |
Message-ID: | 1334688064.10435.14.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On tis, 2012-04-17 at 10:47 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> What's the preferred way to make it automatically tested as much as
> possible? I know the buildfarm does not run "installcheck-world", so if
> we want it there, it'd need a bit more code on the client side. I think
> it would be wise to have it also run on installcheck-world.
It was agreed during the patch discussion that it shouldn't be run
automatically.
> Hmm. Just had this thought: not all platform support the same socket
> types. Maybe we should have separated the .in file in three parts:
> IPv4, IPv6, unix-domain socket. That way each platform would only run
> tests that pertain to it. Right now there's a single "regress.in" file
> that lists all the tests.
That's one reason for that, but there are probably others in the way of
making this fully portable and automatable.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-04-17 18:46:23 | Re: Parameterized-path cost comparisons need some work |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-04-17 18:24:02 | Re: 9.3 Pre-proposal: Range Merge Join |