| From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why can't I use pgxs to build a plpgsql plugin? |
| Date: | 2012-04-16 19:53:20 |
| Message-ID: | 1334606000.2237.7.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 13:09 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 13.04.2012 19:17, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 12:28 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >> On 08.04.2012 11:59, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> >>> There could be a good reason which would explain why we can't (or don't
> >>> want to) do this, but I don't see it right now.
> >>
> >> Me neither, except a general desire to keep internals hidden. I propose
> >> the attached.
> >
> > Sounds good to me. I would love to see this happening in 9.2.
>
> Ok, committed. I fixed the .PHONY line as Tom pointed out, and changed
> MSVC install.pm to also copy the header file.
>
Thanks.
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-04-16 19:56:32 | Re: index-only scans vs. Hot Standby, round two |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-04-16 17:58:03 | Re: index-only scans vs. Hot Standby, round two |