| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Last gasp |
| Date: | 2012-04-11 15:49:04 |
| Message-ID: | 1334159300-sup-8102@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié abr 11 12:44:02 -0300 2012:
> Me neither, but I don't know how far it scales. Having certain people
> who are defined as, say, doc-only committers will not only make it
> clear to those people what they're expected to commit, but also clear
> to everyone else who the people are who might commit any given patch
> they might write. If we just end up with 50 committers and you have
> to follow pgsql-hackers to understand who knows what and which people
> are even still around, it's not going to make anything easier for
> anyone.
Since we're so keen on copying what Linux does, we could just have a
MAINTAINERS file.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Nolan | 2012-04-11 15:55:15 | Re: [HACKERS] [streaming replication] 9.1.3 streaming replication bug ? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-04-11 15:44:02 | Re: Last gasp |