| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Last gasp |
| Date: | 2012-04-10 20:12:36 |
| Message-ID: | 1334088756.13416.71.camel@sussancws0025 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 23:12 -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
> But there is also a flip side to that, namely that if we do so, there
> ought to be some aspect to the process to help guide those items that
> *aren't* particularly close to being committable.
I have benefited immensely from review of my WIP patches, and a lot of
the serious review tends to happen during commitfests. This is most
important for features with a significant user interface, where it's
harder to guess what people will want.
My current strategy is to submit WIP-marked patches during a commitfest.
I agree that we should continue to have a mechanism to review patches
that aren't ready for commit, though I'm fine if we change it.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-04-10 20:32:17 | pg_tablespace_location() error message |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-04-10 20:07:47 | Re: pg_receivexlog stops upon server restart |