Re: Another review of URI for libpq, v7 submission

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Alex <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Another review of URI for libpq, v7 submission
Date: 2012-04-06 06:09:10
Message-ID: 1333692550.32606.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On fre, 2012-04-06 at 00:25 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Some moments of radical thinking later, I became unhappy with the fact
> that the conninfo stuff and parameter keywords are all crammed in the
> PQconnectdbParams description. This feels wrong to me, even more so
> after we expand it even more to add URIs to the mix. I think it's
> better to create a separate sect1 (which I've entitled "Connection
> Strings") which explains the conninfo and URI formats as well as
> accepted keywords. The new section is referenced from the multiple
> places that need it, without having to point to PQconnectdbParams.

Yes, it should be split out. But the libpq chapter already has too many
tiny sect1s. I think it should be a sect2 under "Database Connection
Control".

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-04-06 06:21:17 Re: [PATCH] Support for foreign keys with arrays
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2012-04-06 05:16:08 Re: WIP: Collecting statistics on CSV file data