Re: Statistics collector port / unix dom. socket?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Sabaini <peter(dot)sabaini(at)ait(dot)ac(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Statistics collector port / unix dom. socket?
Date: 2010-05-04 15:39:40
Message-ID: 13335.1272987580@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Peter Sabaini <peter(dot)sabaini(at)ait(dot)ac(dot)at> writes:
> it seems Postgres tries to send a UDP packet to a random high port to
> communicate with the statistics collector daemon. We have rather strict
> packet filter rules in place, and I'd like to make the system use a
> fixed port for this, or even better a Unix domain socket. Is this
> possible (setting a compile time or run time parameter)?

No, the stats collector just uses whatever port bind() chooses for it.
I'd suggest backing off your ideas about how much filtering is
appropriate for local connections.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bob Lunney 2010-05-04 16:09:22 Re: Runaway Locks
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-05-04 14:24:27 Re: Ubuntu 10.04 - Cannot Create TCP/IP Sockets