Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result
Date: 2012-03-27 15:30:39
Message-ID: 1332862194-sup-1033@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Excerpts from Fujii Masao's message of mar mar 27 06:40:34 -0300 2012:

> Anyway, should I add this patch into the next CF? Or is anyone planning
> to commit the patch for 9.2?

I think the correct thing to do here is add to next CF, and if some
committer has enough interest in getting it quickly it can be grabbed
from there and committed into 9.2.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2012-03-27 15:58:21 Re: Command Triggers patch v18
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2012-03-27 15:05:21 Re: Command Triggers patch v18