Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt
Date: 2012-03-17 23:01:51
Message-ID: 1332025214-sup-4400@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Excerpts from Simon Riggs's message of mar mar 06 18:33:13 -0300 2012:

> The lock modes are correct, appropriate and IMHO have meaningful
> names. No redesign required here.
>
> Not sure about the naming of some of the flag bits however.

Feel free to suggest improvements ... I've probably seen them for too
long to find them anything but what I intended them to mean.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-03-17 23:11:57 Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-03-17 22:58:41 Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt