Re: [PATCH] Support for ALTER TABLE ADD UNIQUE/PKEY USING INDEX

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: BillR <iambill(at)williamrosmus(dot)com>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for ALTER TABLE ADD UNIQUE/PKEY USING INDEX
Date: 2012-03-15 22:22:19
Message-ID: 1331850139.2293.48.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 10:30 -0400, BillR wrote:
> Apologies to Guillaume for the duplicate reply, but I didn't hit
> "reply to all" the first time so didn't actually reply to the list. So
> here it is again (the first time).
>

No problem :)

> >pgAdmin only shows the constraint. The fact that it's done with an
> >index
> >is an implementation detail
>
> So creating another index on the column with the 'unique' constraint
> is redundant I take it.

Yes.

> It would seem to me that this "implementation detail" is
> unnecessarily obscure/confusing. But that is with postgresql, not
> pgamin.

Exactly.

> To add to my first reply, I have noticed confusion WRT this from
> others on the web when trying to gain insight searching the web. So I
> know it's not just me. If creating another index is redundant, then I
> suspect there are a lot more redundant indexes out there because of
> the way this is implemented. But again, that is with Postgresql.

Exactly.

--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Lelarge 2012-03-17 17:20:00 pgAdmin III commit: Make sure you can right-click on the right of the n
Previous Message Akshay Joshi 2012-03-15 14:59:24 Fixed issue "Error Message is displayed when the Package is Clicked"