From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Lessons from commit fest |
Date: | 2008-04-14 18:12:08 |
Message-ID: | 13318.1208196728@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> As far as the Wiki page is concerned, it would be good to make sure the
> entries have a bit more info than just a header line -- things such as
> "author", who reviewed and what did the reviewer say about it.
I think it'd be easy to go overboard there. One thing we learned from
Bruce's page is that a display with ten or more lines per work item is
not very helpful ... you start wishing you had a summary, and then the
whole design cycle repeats.
We should not try to make the wiki page be a substitute for reading the
linked-to discussions. (This is one of the reasons that dropped links
in the archives, such as the month-end problem, are so nasty.)
One idea is to make more effective use of horizontal space than we were
doing with the current wiki-page markup. I'd have no objection to
including the author's name and a status indicator if it all fit on the
same line as the patch title/link.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2008-04-14 18:23:27 | Re: Remove lossy-operator RECHECK flag? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-14 17:52:38 | Terminating a backend |