Re: Strategy for Primary Key Generation When Populating Table

From: Vincent Veyron <vv(dot)lists(at)wanadoo(dot)fr>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Strategy for Primary Key Generation When Populating Table
Date: 2012-02-10 15:49:35
Message-ID: 1328888975.2537.12.camel@asus-1001PX.home
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Le jeudi 09 février 2012 à 16:30 -0600, Merlin Moncure a écrit :

> natural/surrogate is a performance/usability debate with various
> tradeoffs. but using surrogate to 'create' uniqueness is a logical
> design error; maybe a very forgivable one for various reasons, but the
> point stands.

Please consider the following case :

I record insurance claims in the table below, where id_evenement,
id_agent and date_origine define a unique event.

However, records sometimes have to be canceled (set annule=true), and
re-recorded the same way. They're normally canceled once, but
occasionnally twice, or more (for various reasons).

What would you use for a primary key?

CREATE TABLE tbldossier (
id_evenement text NOT NULL,
id_agent integer NOT NULL,
date_origine date NOT NULL,
annule boolean DEFAULT false NOT NULL);

--
Vincent Veyron
http://marica.fr/
Logiciel de gestion des sinistres et des contentieux pour le service juridique

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message kenkyee 2012-02-10 18:07:43 anyone use pg_rman successfully w/ Postgresql 9.1 64-bit?
Previous Message Venkat Balaji 2012-02-10 11:17:42 Re: [GENERA]: Postgresql-9.1.1 synchronous replication issue