Quick Links

Re: patch: bytea_agg

From:	Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To:	Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: patch: bytea_agg
Date:	2011-12-23 17:51:38
Message-ID:	1324662698.14547.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

On ons, 2011-12-21 at 11:04 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> this patch adds a bytea_agg aggregation.
>
> It allow fast bytea concatetation.

Why not call it string_agg? All the function names are the same between
text and bytea (e.g., ||, substr, position, length). It would be nice
not to introduce arbitrary differences.

In response to

patch: bytea_agg at 2011-12-21 10:04:16 from Pavel Stehule

Responses

Re: patch: bytea_agg at 2011-12-23 18:23:13 from Pavel Stehule
Re: patch: bytea_agg at 2011-12-23 18:25:07 from Pavel Stehule
Re: patch: bytea_agg at 2011-12-23 18:30:26 from Robert Haas
Re: patch: bytea_agg at 2012-04-04 20:20:20 from Peter Eisentraut

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Pavel Stehule	2011-12-23 18:23:13	Re: patch: bytea_agg
Previous Message	Tom Lane	2011-12-23 17:42:42	Re: Page Checksums + Double Writes