Re: That EXPLAIN ANALYZE patch still needs work

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: "A(dot)M(dot)" <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: That EXPLAIN ANALYZE patch still needs work
Date: 2006-06-10 17:55:28
Message-ID: 1324.1149962128@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> Right now I'm confused though. I was under the impression the changes
> were going to be ripped out because it was decided to be unworkable. I
> think improvements can be made but I'm unsure if there's any
> interest...

I've reverted the current patch because it clearly doesn't work well
enough. There's nothing stopping you from having a better idea though.
It's clear that on some platforms the cost of gettimeofday is high
enough that some workaround would be good.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2006-06-10 17:57:35 Re: archive threads across months (was Re: [HACKERS]
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-06-10 17:48:24 Re: [PATCHES] ADD/DROP INHERITS