Re: plpython SPI cursors

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plpython SPI cursors
Date: 2011-12-10 17:23:32
Message-ID: 1323537812.20837.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On mån, 2011-12-05 at 13:12 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jan Urbański wrote:
> > On 05/12/11 18:58, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > On ons, 2011-11-23 at 19:58 +0100, Jan Urba?ski wrote:
> > >> On 20/11/11 19:14, Steve Singer wrote:
> > >> Responding now to all questions and attaching a revised patch based on
> > >> your comments.
> > >
> > > Committed
> > >
> > > Please refresh the other patch.
> >
> > Great, thanks!
> >
> > I'll try to send an updated version of the other patch this evening.
>
> I assume this is _not_ related to this TODO item:
>
> Add a DB-API compliant interface on top of the SPI interface

No, but this is:
http://petereisentraut.blogspot.com/2011/11/plpydbapi-db-api-for-plpython.html

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-12-10 17:28:38 Re: static or dynamic libpgport
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2011-12-10 17:16:10 Re: %TYPE and array declaration patch review