Re: PostgreSQL 9.1 : why is this query slow?

From: Joost Kraaijeveld <J(dot)Kraaijeveld(at)Askesis(dot)nl>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.1 : why is this query slow?
Date: 2011-11-29 15:39:46
Message-ID: 1322581186.16401.0.camel@panoramix.Askesis.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 11:36 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
>
> > If you really want the intersection, perhaps:
>
> Or maybe closer:
>
> with x as
> (
> select
> word,
> count(*) as countall,
> count(case when filetype = 'f' then 1 else null end)
> as countf,
> count(case when filetype = 's' then 1 else null end)
> as counts,
> count(case when filetype = 'n' then 1 else null end)
> as countn
> from unique_words
> group by word
> )
> select word, least(countf, counts, countn) from x
> where countf > 0 and counts > 0 and countn > 0
> order by word;
>
> Cranked out rather quickly and untested.

I tested it and it worked as advertised. Takes ~ 3 secs to complete.
Thanks.

--
Groeten,

Joost Kraaijeveld
Askesis B.V.
Molukkenstraat 14
6524NB Nijmegen
tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277
fax: 024-3608416
web: www.askesis.nl

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marcus Engene 2011-11-29 16:58:56 Re: WAL in RAM
Previous Message CSS 2011-11-28 22:32:59 Re: Benchmarking tools, methods