| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <munro(at)ip9(dot)org>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: strict aliasing (was: const correctness) |
| Date: | 2011-11-14 21:25:19 |
| Message-ID: | 1321305861-sup-541@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of lun nov 14 17:30:50 -0300 2011:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> >> Also, is there something I should do to deal with the warnings
> >> before this would be considered a meaningful test?
> >
> > Dunno ... where were the warnings exactly?
>
> All 10 were like this:
>
> warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
> strict-aliasing rules
Uhm, shouldn't we expect there to be one warning for each use of a Node
using some specific node pointer type as well as something generic such
as inside a ListCell etc?
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2011-11-14 21:31:27 | Re: why do we need two snapshots per query? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-14 21:22:52 | Re: strict aliasing (was: const correctness) |