Re: const correctness

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <munro(at)ip9(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: const correctness
Date: 2011-11-10 19:49:48
Message-ID: 1320954588.20692.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On ons, 2011-11-09 at 10:49 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Now admittedly you can hack it, in the same
> spirit as the C library functions that are declared to take const
> pointers and return non-const pointers to the very same data

Which C library functions do that?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Singer 2011-11-10 19:52:03 Re: pg_dump 9.1.1 hanging (collectSecLabels gets 0 labels)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-11-10 19:49:32 Re: IDLE in transaction introspection