Re: Anyone using the solaris 11 precompiled binaries on opensolaris snv_134

From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Thomas Mieslinger <thomas(at)mieslinger(dot)de>, Bjorn Munch <bjorn(dot)munch(at)oracle(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Anyone using the solaris 11 precompiled binaries on opensolaris snv_134
Date: 2011-10-22 08:44:48
Message-ID: 1319273088.20792.8.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


Hi,

Adding the Solaris package maintainer, Bjorn.

On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 22:45 +0200, Thomas Mieslinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to run the precomplied binaries form postgresql.org for
> solaris 11 intel. The Readme says it has been compiled on opensolaris
> 2010.11 which is (to the best of my knowledge snv_134). My machine is
> also snv_134.
>
> When I do ldd /usr/postgres/9.1-pgdg/bin/postgres it tells me that:
>
> libsocket.so.1 (SUNW_1.7) => (version not found)
>
> $ pvs /lib/libsocket.so.1
> libnsl.so.1 (SUNW_1.7, SUNWprivate_1.1);
> libc.so.1 (SUNW_1.23, SUNWprivate_1.1);
> libsocket.so.1;
> SUNW_1.6;
> SUNW_1.5;
> SUNW_1.4;
> SUNW_1.3;
> SUNW_1.2;
> SUNW_1.1;
> SUNW_0.7;
> SUNWprivate_1.3;
> SUNWprivate_1.2;
> SUNWprivate_1.1;
>
> So my libc has only the interfaces up to SUNW_1.6. How can this happen
> that two snv_134 machines have different libsockets?
>
> Thanks for your insight
>
> Thomas
>

--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message stefan 2011-10-22 09:12:14 9.0: plpgsql eror when restoring a database as a non superuser
Previous Message Charles Waweru 2011-10-22 05:23:56 is there a function in postgresql that can be used for retrieving deleted rows