| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki(at)jp(dot)freebsd(dot)org>, greg <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation |
| Date: | 2011-10-14 15:29:24 |
| Message-ID: | 1318605995-sup-243@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie oct 14 12:12:22 -0300 2011:
>
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > The guideline, last I checked, was that before getting into coding any
> > item from the TODO list, the prospective hacker should check previous
> > discussions and initiate a new one on this list to ensure consensus.
> > Unless something is blatantly "not wanted", I don't think it should be
> > removed from the TODO list. There not being consensus does not mean
> > that there cannot ever be.
>
> OK. But if we are pretty sure we don't want something, e.g. hibernate,
> we shouldn't add it.
If we're so sure we don't want it, we could add it to the "features we
do not want" section. But as Robert says downthread, I don't see us
being so sure that we don't want hibernation.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-10-14 15:29:36 | Re: patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-10-14 15:21:48 | Re: patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation |