Re: uncataloged tables are a vestigial husk

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: uncataloged tables are a vestigial husk
Date: 2012-06-13 17:22:39
Message-ID: 13178.1339608159@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> The attached patch cleans it up by removing RELKIND_UNCATALOGED and
>>> teaching RelationBuildLocalRelation() to set the relkind itself.

>> I think there are probably some places to fix in the docs too.

> catalogs.sgml doesn't include it in the list of possible relkinds,
> since it never hits the disk. And grep -i uncatalog doc/src/sgml
> comes up empty. Where else should I be looking?

Huh. Okay, there probably isn't anyplace then. I'm surprised we didn't
list it in catalogs.sgml, though.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2012-06-13 17:24:29 Re: [RFC][PATCH] Logical Replication/BDR prototype and architecture
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2012-06-13 17:22:36 Is cachedFetchXidStatus provably valid?