From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Pierre Ducroquet <p(dot)psql(at)pinaraf(dot)info>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #6232: hstore operator ? no longer uses indexes |
Date: | 2011-09-29 03:22:48 |
Message-ID: | 1317266569.18190.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On ons, 2011-09-28 at 22:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Pierre Ducroquet" <p(dot)psql(at)pinaraf(dot)info> writes:
> > [ the "hstore ? text" operator no longer matches an hstore GIST index ]
>
> Hmm ... this doesn't seem to be specific to either hstore or GIST; it's
> a collation problem. The index is marked as having no collation, which
> is reasonable since hstore is a collation-less type. However, the ?
> OpExpr gets marked as having "default" collation because it has one
> collatable input, namely the text constant. And then,
> match_clause_to_indexcol decides the clause doesn't match the index.
>
> Not sure what to do about this. Is it okay to suppose that collation
> can be ignored when matching to a collation-less index?
That sounds correct on first reading.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2011-09-29 04:00:45 | Re: BUG #6232: hstore operator ? no longer uses indexes |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-09-29 02:42:55 | Re: BUG #6232: hstore operator ? no longer uses indexes |