Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] Addition of some trivial auto vacuum logging

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Royce Ausburn <royce(dot)ml(at)inomial(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Addition of some trivial auto vacuum logging
Date: 2011-09-28 00:40:28
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Royce Ausburn's message of mar sep 27 21:28:26 -0300 2011:
> Thanks for the tips guys. 
> Just a question:  is the utility great enough to warrant me working further on this?  I have no real desire to implement this particular feature -- I simply saw an opportunity to cut my teeth on something easy.  I'd be happy to find something on the TODO list instead if this feature isn't really worthwhile.

First patches are always going to be small things.  If you try to tackle
something too large, chances are you'll never finish, despair utterly
and throw yourself off a nearby bridge.  Surely it's better to set
realistic goals, start small and build slowly from there.

> Tom's suggestion looks like it's less trivial that I can do just yet, but I'll take a look and ask for help if I need it.

It's not that difficult.  Just do a search on "git log
src/backend/postmaster/pgstat.c" for patches that add a new column

Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-09-28 00:46:33
Subject: Re: contrib/sepgsql regression tests are a no-go
Previous:From: Stephen FrostDate: 2011-09-28 00:36:29
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Addition of some trivial auto vacuum logging

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group