Re: [PATCH] Addition of some trivial auto vacuum logging

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Royce Ausburn <royce(dot)ml(at)inomial(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Addition of some trivial auto vacuum logging
Date: 2011-09-28 00:40:28
Message-ID: 1317170276-sup-4171@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Excerpts from Royce Ausburn's message of mar sep 27 21:28:26 -0300 2011:
> Thanks for the tips guys.
>
> Just a question: is the utility great enough to warrant me working further on this? I have no real desire to implement this particular feature -- I simply saw an opportunity to cut my teeth on something easy. I'd be happy to find something on the TODO list instead if this feature isn't really worthwhile.

First patches are always going to be small things. If you try to tackle
something too large, chances are you'll never finish, despair utterly
and throw yourself off a nearby bridge. Surely it's better to set
realistic goals, start small and build slowly from there.

> Tom's suggestion looks like it's less trivial that I can do just yet, but I'll take a look and ask for help if I need it.

It's not that difficult. Just do a search on "git log
src/backend/postmaster/pgstat.c" for patches that add a new column
somewhere.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-09-28 00:46:33 Re: contrib/sepgsql regression tests are a no-go
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2011-09-28 00:36:29 Re: [PATCH] Addition of some trivial auto vacuum logging