| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? |
| Date: | 2011-09-21 03:27:53 |
| Message-ID: | 1316575676.16716.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On tis, 2011-09-20 at 11:12 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > +1 for a closed mailing list. It's a bit annoying to have to do
> such
> > > a thing, but it's not like we haven't got other closed lists for
> > > appropriate purposes.
> >
> > Well, that much we've already decided a few years ago. The blocking
> > issues are: (1) do we have enough interest, and (2) where to put it
> (I'm
> > looking at you, pgfoundry).
>
> I don't see why we wouldn't put it in @postgresql.org.
One nice thing about pgfoundry would be the document manager. Also, at
least at some point in the past, a pgfoundry project was easier to
manage than getting anything done about a @postgresql.org mailing list.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-09-21 03:42:14 | Re: Isolation tests still falling over routinely |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-09-21 02:50:24 | Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby |