Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
Date: 2011-09-18 14:08:05
Message-ID: 1316354886.12186.5.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On fre, 2011-09-16 at 07:38 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> So, generally speaking, what kinds of things are going to be brought
> up at the ISO meeting? Is this an opportunity to get postgres special
> syntax drafted into the sql standard?

Don't expect to take a PostgreSQL-specific feature, say, CREATE RULE or
CREATE AGGREGATE, and make it into an ISO standard. The "big boys"
still run the show, and it's unlikely that something gets accepted
without buy in from one of the major proprietary vendors. Besides,
writing actual standards is difficult and time-consuming work. But what
you can accomplish is to mold upcoming features so that they don't clash
with PostgreSQL, or better yet benefit PostgreSQL. Also, you can mold
future PostgreSQL features in the converse way.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-09-18 14:14:32 Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2011-09-18 13:11:41 Re: Double sorting split patch