Re: Couple document fixes

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Couple document fixes
Date: 2011-09-06 01:07:29
Message-ID: 1315271205-sup-7449@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from David Fetter's message of lun sep 05 21:05:10 -0300 2011:

> On brief inspection, it appears that each of these would be better
> served, at least functionally, with some kind of enumerated type.
> Might it be worth trying to micro-optimize this case for a one-byte
> enum? Or maybe something like the varvarlena pattern?

What would be the point? It works pretty well already. It doesn't need
fixing.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message lsliang 2011-09-06 02:43:57 about value storage
Previous Message David Fetter 2011-09-06 00:05:10 Re: Couple document fixes

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-09-06 02:08:22 Re: Shared invalidation cache messages for temporary tables
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-09-06 00:19:21 Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem