Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing
Date: 2011-09-03 14:24:40
Message-ID: 1315059883.11695.22.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On fre, 2011-09-02 at 19:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The only one that's problematic is pg_regress.so; contrib modules are
> already installed in $libdir. I still think that installing
> pg_regress.so in $libdir may be the most reasonable solution, assuming
> that the delta involved isn't too great. Yeah, we would have to
> back-patch the changes into every release branch we want to test
> upgrading from, but how risky is that really? The *only* thing it
> affects is the regression tests.

Or maybe make use of dynamic_library_path.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-09-03 14:35:41 Re: pgsql: Remove "fmgr.h" include in cube contrib --- caused crash on a Ge
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-09-03 14:23:09 Re: pgsql: Remove "fmgr.h" include in cube contrib --- caused crash on a Ge