Re: Rationalizing code-sharing among src/bin/ directories

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Aleksey Demakov <a(dot)demakov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rationalizing code-sharing among src/bin/ directories
Date: 2016-03-24 19:02:38
Message-ID: 13129.1458846158@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Aleksey Demakov <a(dot)demakov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
> Hi there,
>> On 23 Mar 2016, at 22:38, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Anybody want to bikeshed the directory name src/feutils? Maybe fe-utils
>> would be more readable. And where to put the corresponding header files?
>> src/include/fe-utils?

> For me utils" sounds like something of auxiliary nature. if some pretty
> basic stuff is going to be added there, then I believe that fe_common or
> perhaps fe_shared would be a bit more suitable.

Meh... The stuff that is in-scope for it at the moment doesn't seem
all that basic. It's just assorted widgets that turned out to be
useful outside their original home. Really basic stuff is going into
src/common/ these days.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-03-24 19:10:42 Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Previous Message Matthias Kurz 2016-03-24 19:00:09 Re: Alter or rename enum value