| From: | salah jubeh <s_jubeh(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: variant column type |
| Date: | 2011-07-26 17:17:10 |
| Message-ID: | 1311700630.26088.YahooMailRC@web161519.mail.bf1.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello John,
I mean ANSI SQL 92 complaint, if I am not mistaken. One solution to this problem
is to use something like hstore. but it has some disadvantages in my
application so I want another opinion.
Regards
________________________________
From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Sent: Tue, July 26, 2011 7:10:47 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] variant column type
On 07/26/11 10:02 AM, salah jubeh wrote:
> and using ANSI compliant design
American National Standards Institute? they have an ANSI standard on database
schema design or something?
-- john r pierce N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
-- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ben Chobot | 2011-07-26 17:37:39 | Re: variant column type |
| Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2011-07-26 17:10:47 | Re: variant column type |