| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: range types and ip4r |
| Date: | 2011-07-20 03:17:54 |
| Message-ID: | 1311131874.31101.37.camel@jdavis |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 09:38 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Just wondering, will the planned range type functionality also be able
> to absorb the functionality of the ip4r type as a range of the ip4 type
> (http://pgfoundry.org/projects/ip4r)? Maybe it's trivial, but since the
> ip types also have a kind of hierarchical structure, I figured I'd point
> it out in case you hadn't considered it.
Thanks for bringing that up.
It had briefly crossed my mind, but I didn't see any problem with it.
Does it use the hierarchical nature to manipulate the values at all, or
is it just a flat range?
If it's just a flat range it would be similar to int4range, I would
think.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joey Adams | 2011-07-20 03:42:52 | Fwd: Initial Review: JSON contrib modul was: Re: Another swing at JSON |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-07-20 02:01:09 | Re: Initial Review: JSON contrib modul was: Re: Another swing at JSON |